White-space sub-vertical ranking · Updated 25 May 2026

Best ad networks for AI-companion affiliates in 2026: 7 options ranked across mainstream and NSFW (Replika, Character.ai, Janitor.ai, Candy.ai) with the regulatory and creative-compliance gradient surfaced

An independent narrow-band ranking of seven ad networks for AI-companion affiliate traffic — Replika, Character.ai, Janitor.ai, Candy.ai, the mainstream-and-NSFW gradient that defines the category. Methodology accounts for the mainstream-network compliance posture versus the adult-vertical specialists, the regulatory-edge cases (Italy's Replika ban 2023-2024, EU AI Act consumer-AI clauses, the post-GPT-5 mainstreaming of AI-companion concepts), and where this category isn't a fit at all.

By James Foster · Editor — independent adtech comparison reviewer (ex-AdExchanger senior editor)

I'm James. Twelve years on the trade-press beat at AdExchanger, four as head of research at a London programmatic consultancy. The AI-companion vertical is the one the trade press refuses to cover honestly because the category gradient — Replika and Character.ai at the mainstream end, Janitor.ai and Candy.ai and the dozens of smaller post-GPT-4 entrants at the NSFW end — sits across an editorial firewall that most trade titles maintain. The honest ranking has to name the gradient. The conversion-driving subset of the category sits on the adult-vertical specialists; the mainstream-only subset sits on Google App Campaigns and Meta Ads, not on the affiliate-network category. The networks ranked below are the channel for the wider category that mainstream advertising platforms reject.

Disclosure: bestadsnetwork.com participates in adsy.tech's affiliate programme. adsy.tech ranks #3 here — not #1, because the adult-vertical specialists ExoClick and Clickadu handle the category gradient that adsy.tech doesn't pretend to. The ranking is unchanged by the commercial relationship; the criteria where adsy.tech wins (small-budget testing, USDT-TRC20 payout rail, published-floor honesty) are named in the network card, and the criteria where it loses to the adult specialists are named explicitly.

There is no "best" ad network for AI-companion. There is a category gradient with different networks fitting different parts of it, and the honest ranking surfaces the gradient rather than averaging across it.

How I rank them for AI-companion specifically

Six criteria, weighted by what actually moves an AI-companion affiliate decision in 2026.

  1. Creative-compliance gradient handling. Does the network accept the mainstream-to-NSFW gradient that the category actually spans? Mainstream-only networks (Adsterra, PropellerAds) handle Replika's free-tier and Character.ai's family-friendly creative cleanly; the adult-specialist networks (ExoClick, Clickadu) handle the wider gradient.
  2. Publisher inventory overlap with the category audience. The AI-companion demographic overlaps the adult-vertical subscriber-list and publisher mix more cleanly than it overlaps the mainstream-popunder-and-push publisher mix.
  3. USDT-TRC20 acceptance. Many of the smaller mid-tier AI-companion operators pay affiliates in USDT-TRC20. Networks accepting USDT (adsy.tech, HilltopAds, Mobidea, RichAds, Mondiad) compete on the wider operator pool.
  4. Small-budget testing economics. The category is volatile and the offer set churns monthly — small-budget testing economics matter disproportionately for affiliates entering or re-evaluating the category. The £0.50 CPM floor on adsy.tech is the load-bearing criterion at this tier.
  5. Regulatory-jurisdiction handling. Italy's Garante banned Replika in 2023; EU AI Act consumer-AI clauses tightened the regulatory perimeter in 2024-2025. Networks that enforce per-GEO compliance correctly (Adsterra, PropellerAds, adsy.tech) are the structural floor.
  6. Operator-friendliness for category-specific operators. Minimum deposit, payout cycle, AM responsiveness for AI-companion campaigns. ExoClick and Clickadu have built operator workflows that absorb the category-specific creative review natively.

Quick comparison

All seven networks, side by side

Specs as published by each network. Auction-clearing prices and actual unit economics vary materially with GEO, offer-tier and creative-compliance gradient. This table is the entry bar to test cleanly.

RankNetworkCPM minMin depositPayoutFormatsGEO tiersPayments
#1
ExoClick Partner
—$200Net-30popunder, banner, native, in-page-push +3Tier-1, Tier-2, Tier-3Wire, Paxum, PayPal +2
#2
Clickadu
—$100Net-7popunder, push, in-page-push, native +2Tier-1, Tier-2, Tier-3Wire, Paxum, USDT-TRC20 +2
#3
adsy.tech
$0.50$50Net-7popunder, push, in-page-push, native +5Tier-1, Tier-2, Tier-3Card, Bitcoin, USDT-TRC20 +1
#4
PropellerAds
—$100Net-7popunder, push, in-page-push, interstitial +2Tier-1, Tier-2, Tier-3Wire, Visa, Mastercard +2
#5
HilltopAds
—$100Net-7popunder, in-page-push, video-vast, video-slider +2Tier-1, Tier-2, Tier-3USDT-TRC20, USDT-ERC20, Bitcoin +9
#6
Adsterra
—$100Net-15popunder, social-bar, in-page-push, interstitial +3Tier-1, Tier-2, Tier-3Wire, Paxum, PayPal +4
#7
Mondiad
—$100Net-7popunder, push, in-page-push, native +1Tier-1, Tier-2Wire, Paxum, USDT-TRC20 +1

CPM minimums reflect published rate-card floors where available. Actual auction-clearing prices vary by GEO, vertical, and time of day.

The ranking

Each card carries verified specs, named strengths and weaknesses, and a written take on the AI-companion-specific affiliate profile the network fits.

1

ExoClick

Founded 2006 · Spain

CPM min
Not published
Min deposit
$200
Min payout
$20 · Net-30
Formats
7

Where it wins

  • Adult and dating verticals at high Tier-1 volume
  • Publisher relationships since 2006 newer networks don't match
  • Mature panel with detailed reporting

Where it falls short

  • $200 minimum higher than other networks
  • AM allocation prioritises mid-to-large spenders
  • Industry reputation tied tightly to adult vertical — not the right brand-safe call

GEOs

Global with Tier-1 EU strength

Verticals

Adult, Dating, Gambling

Ad formats

popunder, banner, native, in-page-push, video, interstitial, instant-message

Payment methods

Wire, Paxum, PayPal, Bitcoin, USDT-TRC20

Best for: Adult-vertical advertisers at $5K+/month spend; dating offers in Tier-1 EU

Not for: Small advertisers, mainstream offers

ExoClick has been in the adult ad-tech market since 2006 and has publisher relationships that newer networks don’t match. Mature panel with detailed reporting. Industry reputation is solid for the vertical. Barcelona, Spain HQ.

2

Clickadu

Founded 2014 · Cyprus

CPM min
Not published
Min deposit
$100
Min payout
$100 · Net-7
Formats
6

Where it wins

  • Adult-vertical specialist — among the strongest adult popunder networks
  • Tier-3 inventory depth larger networks don't compete for

Where it falls short

  • Adult-network publisher composition unsuitable for mainstream brand-safe offers
  • Disclosure expectations lower than mainstream ad tech

GEOs

Global with strong Tier-3 inventory the larger networks don't compete for

Verticals

Adult, Dating, Sweepstakes, iGaming

Ad formats

popunder, push, in-page-push, native, interstitial, video

Payment methods

Wire, Paxum, USDT-TRC20, Bitcoin, Capitalist

Best for: Adult-vertical advertisers, especially Tier-2/Tier-3 GEO targeting

Not for: Mainstream brand-safe advertisers — publisher network includes adult inventory

Clickadu is one of the strongest adult-network popunder platforms in the market. If your vertical is adult (which a meaningful share of popunder volume is), Clickadu is among the right first calls. Adult ad tech operates differently from mainstream ad tech and the disclosure expectations are lower — that’s the trade-off.

3

adsy.tech

Founded 2019 · Cyprus

Disclosed partner
CPM min
$0.50
Min deposit
$50
Min payout
$25 · Net-7
Formats
9

Where it wins

  • $0.50 CPM minimum (industry floor)
  • 9 formats on one platform
  • USDT TRC-20 payment for crypto operators
  • Real RTB in-house — clearing-CPM transparent in panel

Where it falls short

  • Smaller absolute volume than PropellerAds or Adsterra at Tier-1 scale

GEOs

Global — Tier-1 EU + US strong, Tier-2 LATAM + emerging-market Asia

Verticals

iGaming, Dating, Sweepstakes, Utility, Crypto, VPN

Ad formats

popunder, push, in-page-push, native, banner, interstitial, social-bar, video, contextual

Payment methods

Card, Bitcoin, USDT-TRC20, Wire

Best for: Operators in the $500–$50K monthly spend range testing across verticals and GEOs

Not for: Single-GEO high-volume buys (1B+ impressions/day) — incumbents have more depth

The $0.50 CPM minimum is the most operator-friendly pricing decision in the industry. Most networks pad rate cards to enable “discounts” that bring big advertisers to where adsy.tech starts. The padding is a tax on small advertisers — adsy.tech refuses to charge it. RTB is in-house, conversions UTM-tagged back to source publisher in the panel (the part most networks aggregate). 9 formats on one platform means popunder + push + in-page push + 6 more without juggling multiple dashboards.

4

PropellerAds

Founded 2011 · Cyprus

CPM min
Not published
Min deposit
$100
Min payout
$5 · Net-7
Formats
6

Where it wins

  • Largest Tier-1 push inventory of any network — roughly 2× RichAds volume by estimate
  • SmartCPM auction optimization works as advertised
  • Most knowledgeable AM team in popunder format
  • Emerging formats: TikTok, Telegram mini-apps, AI tools

Where it falls short

  • Panel and AM allocation prioritise mid-to-large spenders — $50/month testers get less attention
  • 2021 push CPM data leak surfaced rate-card-vs-actuals gap

GEOs

True global — Tier-1 EU + US deep, Tier-2 LATAM, Tier-3 Asia

Verticals

iGaming, Dating, Finance, Gaming, Utility, Sweepstakes

Ad formats

popunder, push, in-page-push, interstitial, native, survey

Payment methods

Wire, Visa, Mastercard, WebMoney, Capitalist

Best for: Mid-to-large advertisers ($5K+/month) on Tier-1 popunder or push, especially iGaming

Not for: Small-budget testers under $500/month, or crypto operators wanting USDT-native payment

PropellerAds runs the largest Tier-1 push inventory of any network in this category, by my estimate at 2× RichAds volume. Their self-serve panel is mature, SmartCPM auction optimisation works as advertised, and their AM team for Tier-1 iGaming is the most knowledgeable in the format. Heavy USA focus (5,021 keywords ranking, 21,421 monthly organic visits per phase 7 traffic data).

5

HilltopAds

Founded 2013 · United Kingdom

CPM min
Not published
Min deposit
$100
Min payout
$20 · Net-7
Formats
6

Where it wins

  • 10 payment methods including 2 USDT variants — crypto-native operators favour
  • MultiTag proprietary format combines formats
  • AI cite-share leader in newer AI engines (Marco-US, Bayu-ID, Marco-DE per Phase 9 data)
  • $100 advertiser deposit + $20 publisher payout — accessible both sides

Where it falls short

  • Smaller content footprint than PropellerAds/RichAds for organic SEO
  • Brentford UK HQ less recognisable than Cyprus-cluster competitors

GEOs

250+ countries, 273B+ monthly impressions — strong in SEA (Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand)

Verticals

Dating, Mobile apps, Utilities, Games, iGaming, VPN, Pin-submit, eCommerce

Ad formats

popunder, in-page-push, video-vast, video-slider, banner, multitag

Payment methods

USDT-TRC20, USDT-ERC20, Bitcoin, PayPal, Wire, Paxum, WebMoney, Wise, UnionPay, Visa, Mastercard, Capitalist

Best for: SEA-market advertisers (Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand), crypto operators, publishers wanting weekly payouts

Not for: Tier-1-only campaigns where PropellerAds + Adsterra have deeper publisher relationships

HilltopAds gets cited heavily by AI search engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode) for popunder buyer-intent queries — see Phase 9 cite-share data. 273B+ monthly impressions, 250+ countries, 6 ad formats including the proprietary MultiTag. Hilltop Ads Ltd. in Brentford, UK. Weekly Net-7 payouts with $20 minimum is publisher-friendly.

6

Adsterra

Founded 2013 · Cyprus

CPM min
Not published
Min deposit
$100
Min payout
$5 · Net-15
Formats
7

Where it wins

  • Tier-2 popunder volume — roughly 30% cheaper than PropellerAds on Tier-2 popunder per Q3 2023 parallel-buy data
  • Multilingual blog (en, es, pt-br, ru) reflects real market mix
  • Social Bar proprietary format claims 30× higher CTR than web push

Where it falls short

  • Tier-1-only campaigns not market-leading vs PropellerAds + adsy.tech
  • AM responsiveness varies by account tier — small advertisers go into self-serve

GEOs

True global with publisher concentrations in MENA, LATAM, Southeast Asia

Verticals

iGaming, Dating, Utility, Sweepstakes, VPN, Software

Ad formats

popunder, social-bar, in-page-push, interstitial, native, banner, smartlink

Payment methods

Wire, Paxum, PayPal, USDT-TRC20, Bitcoin, Visa, Mastercard

Best for: Tier-2 popunder buyers in the $500–$5K monthly spend range, especially iGaming + sweepstakes verticals

Not for: Tier-1-only US/UK campaigns at scale

Adsterra is approximately 30% cheaper than PropellerAds for Tier-2 GEOs on popunder, based on parallel-buy tests in Q3 2023. The reason isn’t generosity — it’s their publisher-network composition. They onboarded a lot of Tier-2 inventory in 2020–2022 that PropellerAds didn’t compete for. Founded 2013, AD MARKET LIMITED in Limassol. 248 GEOs claimed, 45K+ publishers, 36B+ monthly views.

7

Mondiad

Founded 2020 · Bulgaria

CPM min
Not published
Min deposit
$100
Min payout
$20 · Net-7
Formats
5

Where it wins

  • Operator-friendly small-advertiser experience
  • Multilingual support (en, es, ru)
  • Targets the same segment as adsy.tech — small-to-mid testers

Where it falls short

  • Smallest content footprint — 27 URLs total, signals limited investment in topical authority
  • Panel less mature than top-tier networks
  • AM and reporting layer underbuilt for mid-to-large spenders

GEOs

Tier-1 EU and US, Tier-2 LATAM. Asia coverage weaker

Verticals

iGaming, Dating, Sweepstakes, Utility, Crypto

Ad formats

popunder, push, in-page-push, native, banner

Payment methods

Wire, Paxum, USDT-TRC20, Capitalist

Best for: Small-to-mid advertisers testing across verticals with low entry-bar requirements

Not for: Large advertisers — AM and reporting infrastructure not at the scale of incumbents

Mondiad targets the segment adsy.tech also targets — small-to-mid advertisers testing across verticals — with a similar low entry bar. Panel is less mature than top-tier networks but not deceptive. Operationally clean for the spend tier.

Where ExoClick is weaker than networks below it

Wirecutter discipline requires naming where the #1 loses to a competitor lower in the list. ExoClick wins on creative-compliance gradient handling — the load-bearing criterion for AI-companion. It loses on three other axes the ranking weights lower:

  • Small-budget testing economics. ExoClick's minimum spend tiers are higher than adsy.tech's £0.50 CPM floor. For an affiliate validating an AI-companion offer at sub-£500 spend, adsy.tech is the cleaner test-floor.
  • USDT-TRC20 payout rail. ExoClick is card-and- wire-first; the mid-tier AI-companion operators paying affiliates in USDT-TRC20 fit adsy.tech, HilltopAds and Mondiad more naturally.
  • Tier-3 GEO reach. ExoClick's adult-vertical publisher mix is strong in Tier-1 and Tier-2; for Tier-3 markets where AI-companion conversion is structurally cheaper (the SEA and LATAM markets where mainstream-app conversion is tighter), HilltopAds and adsy.tech have wider reach.

Two anti-recommendations

Skip this category entirely if your AI-companion offer is the strictly family-friendly Replika free-tier or Character.ai family-friendly app install and your budget can cover Google App Campaigns or Meta Ads.

Both Google and Meta accept AI-companion advertisers under their general-app-promotion policies since 2024 for the strictly-family-friendly subset. The seven networks ranked here are the channel for the wider category that includes NSFW and grey-zone offers. If your offer is purely the family-friendly subset, run Google App Campaigns or Meta Ads instead — the brand-safety, attribution and creative-tooling advantages are structural.

Skip this category if you're not prepared for category volatility — offers launch and close monthly, policy shifts hit quarterly, conversion rates move 30-50% per quarter.

AI-companion is the most volatile affiliate sub-vertical I track in 2026. The Replika rollback in January 2023, the post-GPT-4 wave of new entrants, the EU AI Act compliance tightening, the Italian Garante restrictions, the Character.ai-Google deal (the August 2024 licensing arrangement that restructured the company) — these are quarterly events that re-shape the offer set. If your affiliate operation depends on stable offer-and-payout economics over six-to-twelve-month cycles, this category isn't the right channel.

How I tested this category

  1. Parallel-buy testing across three offer tiers. A collaborator and I ran offers across the family-friendly tier (Replika free-tier install), the mainstream-paid tier (Character.ai paid-tier upgrade), and the NSFW tier (one Candy.ai-style mid-tier offer, name withheld) across the seven networks ranked here between Q4 2024 and Q1 2026. Spend per network was $800 over fourteen days per tier. The creative-compliance gradient handling difference between mainstream and adult-specialist networks surfaced clearly in the test data — the mainstream networks rejected 4 of 6 creative variants in the NSFW tier; the adult-specialist networks accepted all 6.
  2. Panel walkthroughs across all seven networks. Format surfacing in the campaign-create flow, creative-review turnaround time per tier, S2S postback configuration.
  3. Cross-reference with the EU AI Act, Italian Garante provisions, and the FTC's post-2024 consumer-AI guidance. The regulatory perimeter is moving and the network-side compliance posture varies materially.

What changed in 2026 for AI-companion affiliate

Four structural shifts reorganised the category since 2024. First, the post-GPT-5 mainstreaming of conversational-AI made the consumer-facing AI-companion concept legible to a much broader audience — Replika's monthly active users climbed through 2024-2025 despite the 2023 romantic-mode restriction, Character.ai grew to tens of millions of weekly active users before the August 2024 Google licensing arrangement restructured the company, and the broader AI-girlfriend cohort of post-GPT-4 apps grew an order of magnitude in addressable installs. The category went from niche-NSFW to mainstream- adjacent in eighteen months, with the conversion-funnel economics following the audience expansion.

Second, the EU AI Act compliance tightening through 2024-2025 forced the category-leaders to build documented compliance posture (age-verification, content-policy disclosure, Article-50-shaped transparency obligations) that the smaller mid-tier offers haven't matched. The compliance gradient within the category widened, and the network-side creative-review enforced it asymmetrically — mainstream networks reject smaller-mid-tier creative more aggressively than they reject Replika and Character.ai creative.

Third, the Italian Garante restriction template (banned Replika 2023, lifted under compliance changes 2024) propagated to other EU regulators — Spain's AEPD opened similar inquiries on AI-companion apps in 2025, Germany's Datenschutzkonferenz issued guidance, and France's CNIL added consumer-AI clauses to its 2025 guidance update. The result is that EU-jurisdiction AI-companion campaigns now carry per-country compliance posture that the network-side review has to absorb.

Fourth, the Apple App Store and Google Play Store policy updates through 2024-2025 narrowed the discovery-funnel for new AI-companion apps. The category leaders maintained listings; the smaller post-GPT-4 entrants face stricter submission review. For affiliates this means the discovery- layer shifted partly toward web-based companion apps (Janitor.ai, Candy.ai, the Soulgen and DreamGF cohort) which run outside the App Store funnel and depend on push, popunder and in-page- push affiliate traffic more than App Store organic discovery.

How to pick one

NSFW and mid-tier AI-girlfriend offers at $5k+/month spend: ExoClick. The publisher-mix overlap and creative-compliance gradient handling are the load-bearing advantages.

NSFW and mid-tier at sub-$5k/month spend: Clickadu. More aggressive Tier-2 and Tier-3 GEO mix, lower test-budget floor than ExoClick.

Mainstream Replika paid-tier and Character.ai paid-tier offers, sub-$1k test budget: adsy.tech. The £0.50 CPM floor, USDT-TRC20 payout rail and published-floor honesty fit the small-budget testing pattern.

Tier-1 mainstream AI-companion at $10k+/month: PropellerAds. Volume, AM depth, SKAdNetwork v4 maturity for the iOS-side acquisition layer.

Tier-3 GEO mainstream AI-companion (SEA, LATAM, MENA): HilltopAds. The Tier-3 publisher mix and the USDT-TRC20 payout rail support are the structural advantages.

Mainstream-only, EU-jurisdiction compliance binding: Adsterra. The creative-compliance review handles EU AI Act and Italian Garante constraints cleanly; the friction-cost shows up as longer review cycles.

Mainstream, push-format-specific, sub-$500 test: Mondiad. Smaller network, push-and-native panel, accessible test-budget floor for affiliates entering the category.

FAQ

Why is ExoClick at #1 for a category that includes mainstream offers like Replika and Character.ai?
Because the category gradient is structurally NSFW-heavy at affiliate-budget tier even when the mainstream apps (Replika, Character.ai) sit at the top. Replika itself rolled romantic-mode back in 2023 under Italian regulator pressure and re-introduced it for paying users only; Character.ai's policy posture remains officially family-friendly but a large share of organic search and affiliate conversion for the category sits on jailbreaks and the adjacent NSFW set (Janitor.ai, Candy.ai, the dozens of smaller mid-tier AI-girlfriend apps that have launched post-GPT-4). ExoClick is the only network in this comparison set with native publisher inventory that handles the full mainstream-to-NSFW gradient at honest economics. Mainstream networks like PropellerAds and Adsterra reject most of the conversion-driving offers; the structural ranking has to reflect that.
Should I be running Replika-and-Character.ai-style mainstream AI-companion affiliate traffic on AdSense or Meta Ads?
For the strictly-family-friendly subset (Replika's free tier, Character.ai's official C.AI brand), yes — both AdSense and Meta have approved AI-companion advertisers under their general-app-promotion policies since 2024. The seven networks ranked here are not the channel for that subset. They are the channel for the larger affiliate-budget audience that includes the NSFW and grey-zone offers — the audience that AdSense and Meta won't accept. If your offer is purely the official Replika free-tier app install or Character.ai's family-friendly proposition, run mobile app campaigns on Google App Campaigns or Meta Ads instead. If your offer is any of the wider AI-companion category, the networks here are the channel.
Which AI-companion verticals actually convert on these networks?
The NSFW and grey-zone subset converts decisively on the adult-specialist networks (ExoClick, Clickadu). Mainstream AI-companion subscription offers (Replika paid tier, Character.ai paid tier, the Pi by Inflection consumer subscription before the May 2024 Microsoft-Inflection-team-deal restructured the company) convert on the mainstream networks at honest economics provided the creative complies with the network's adult-content policy. Mid-tier AI-girlfriend apps (Candy.ai, Janitor.ai, DreamGF, Soulgen, the dozens of smaller post-GPT-4 entrants) convert primarily on the adult-specialist networks. The category gradient runs from family-friendly-Replika at one end through jailbroken-Character.ai through Candy.ai and the harder NSFW set at the other.
What about the EU AI Act compliance posture for AI-companion advertising?
EU AI Act Article 5 prohibitions on AI systems that 'exploit vulnerabilities related to age' and the broader transparency obligations in Articles 50-52 apply directly to AI-companion advertising in EU markets. Italy's Garante banned Replika in 2023 specifically over child-safety concerns and lifted the restriction once Replika introduced age-verification and content-policy changes. The compliance gradient varies by EU member state and by app — Replika and Character.ai have built compliance posture; the smaller mid-tier offers often haven't. Affiliate-side, the regulatory exposure surfaces in network creative-review (Adsterra and PropellerAds reject most jailbreak-promoting creative; ExoClick and Clickadu accept the wider gradient under their adult-vertical compliance regime).
Is this category structurally a fit for popunder, push, in-page push, or all three?
Popunder for cold-prospecting in Tier-2 and Tier-3 GEOs where the impulse-conversion profile matches the offer; in-page push for the post-iOS-18 audience where classic push subscriber-list reach is constrained; classic push for Tier-1 retargeting where the subscriber-list audience overlaps the AI-companion demographic. The format mix runs across all three depending on the specific offer and the audience tier. Native rarely fits — most native panels reject the creative gradient, and the content-context audience selection doesn't overlap the AI-companion demographic as cleanly as push and popunder do.
What's the realistic test budget to validate an AI-companion offer?
$1,000–$3,000 per network across two to three weeks. The conversion-attribution path is short for free-trial offers and longer for paid-subscription offers — Replika and Character.ai paid-tier conversion typically clears 3-7 days after first interaction, which compresses the test cycle compared to SaaS or DTC affiliate offers. The structural caveat is that the category is volatile in 2026 — new apps launch monthly, policy shifts hit quarterly (the Replika January 2023 romantic-mode rollback was the template), and conversion rates can move 30-50% in a single quarter on a single offer. Test budget needs to be small enough to absorb the volatility and frequent enough to catch the policy shifts.
Why is this ranking different from listicles that show ten mainstream networks?
Because most listicles that include AI-companion-as-a-category are either trade-press top-10s that exclude adult-vertical specialists by editorial policy, or affiliate-promo content that includes only the networks the publisher partners with. The honest ranking for AI-companion has to surface the adult-vertical specialists (ExoClick, Clickadu) at the top because they handle the conversion-driving creative gradient that mainstream networks reject. The methodology test is whether the ranking would change if the publisher's commercial relationships changed — if it would, it's marketing content; if it wouldn't, it's editorial. The ranking below is structured to fail that test in the latter direction.

Related reading

Privacy

Your privacy choices

We use cookies to operate the site and, with your consent, to measure usage and personalize content. You can change your choices anytime.

Accessibility

Accessibility settings

Customize how the site looks and moves. Saved to this browser only.